<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 'Poli-tech-cal' Prose Suey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prosesuey.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prosesuey.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Blogging about the Internet's impact on politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Trippi said a mouthful by Michael</title>
		<link>http://prosesuey.wordpress.com/2008/06/22/trippi-said-a-mouthful/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosesuey.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-5</guid>
		<description>although here&#039;s a decent one actually: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11086.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>although here&#8217;s a decent one actually: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11086.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11086.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trippi said a mouthful by Michael</title>
		<link>http://prosesuey.wordpress.com/2008/06/22/trippi-said-a-mouthful/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosesuey.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-4</guid>
		<description>hi &quot;PS&quot; -- thanks for this post; my impression is that except for tracking online fundraising success, the media is somewhat less engaged in the tech/digital elements of this cycle&#039;s pres. campaign than in 2004 when it was more of a novelty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi &#8220;PS&#8221; &#8212; thanks for this post; my impression is that except for tracking online fundraising success, the media is somewhat less engaged in the tech/digital elements of this cycle&#8217;s pres. campaign than in 2004 when it was more of a novelty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
